Header Logo 2
My Newsletter Resources 1:1 PhD/DBA Mentoring
LOG IN
← Back to all posts

#98 - 8 Big Warning Signs When Choosing a PhD Advisor (That Could Save Your Academic Future)

May 14, 2025
Connect

Today, I'm sharing 8 warning signs I wish someone had told me before I spent 12 painful months with the wrong advisor.

 

14 May 2025

Read time: 3 minutes


Offers and opportunities:

Supporting our sponsors directly helps us continue delivering valuable content for FREE to you each week — your clicks make a difference!

My Academic Job Accelerator Program
 

Transform your academic job search with the 6P Success System - my proven framework that's helped hundreds of PhDs land positions at top institutions in just 6 weeks.
 
Master the hidden rules of academic hiring, develop a standout research identity, and create application materials that get you noticed in 75 seconds or less.
 
Limited spots available for our June cohort with early-bird pricing until May 30th - completely FREE videos to try out and assessment to determine if you're a good fit. 

Bohrium AI

Transform your research process with Bohrium Science Navigator - the ethical AI research assistant that helped me cut my literature review from 3 months to just 3 days.

Access 160M+ verified academic papers, extract direct quotes with automatic citations, and create comprehensive literature maps with zero hallucinations.

Experience the perfect balance of AI efficiency and academic integrity - and the best part? It's completely FREE to use today.


Sponsor this newsletter

Picking the right PhD advisor might be the most important choice of your academic life.

A good advisor helps your career soar, but the wrong one can make your PhD years miserable or even force you to quit.

Most students pick advisors based only on research topics or university rankings.

Today, I'm sharing 8 warning signs I wish someone had told me before I spent 12 painful months with the wrong advisor.

These simple checks have helped dozens of my readers find supportive mentors and avoid years of stress.

 

When I started my PhD, I chose an advisor with famous papers and lots of grant money.

What I didn't notice were the warning signs that made three students quit his lab in the three years before I joined.

After switching advisors (and losing nearly 12 months of work), I started asking successful PhD students and recent graduates how they picked their advisors.

Their insights helped me create this simple checklist of warning signs anyone can spot before making a commitment.

 

Warning Sign #1: Their students take too long to graduate

Most advisors will tell you their students finish in 4-5 years. Check if that's true.

How to check: Ask directly: "When did your last three students start and finish their PhDs?"

Then talk to current students to verify. If most students take 6+ years or can't predict when they'll finish, be careful.

 

Warning Sign #2: Their students aren't getting jobs they want

A good advisor helps students reach their career goals, whether in universities, industry, or elsewhere.

How to check: Ask: "Where are your last five students working now?"

Look for advisors whose students get the kinds of jobs you want. If they can't name where former students work, that's a bad sign.

 

Warning Sign #3: They're never around

Some professors are so busy with their own work that they barely meet with students.

How to check: Ask current students: "How often do you meet with the professor?" and "How long does it take to get feedback on your work?"

Good advisors make regular time for students and return work within 2-3 weeks.

 

Warning Sign #4: They pit students against each other

Bad advisors create unhealthy competition instead of teamwork.

How to check: Ask students: "How do lab members get along?" and "Do students help each other?"

Visit the lab to feel the mood yourself. If students look unhappy or scared around their advisor, run!

 

Warning Sign #5: They take credit for students' work

Good advisors help students shine. Bad ones put their names first on papers they barely helped with.

How to check: Look at their recent papers. If the advisor is always first author even when the work was clearly done by students, that's a red flag.

Ask students: "How does your advisor decide the order of names on papers?"

 

Warning Sign #6: They have a trail of students who quit

Nothing shows advisor problems more clearly than students who leave without finishing.

How to check: Ask directly: "Have any students left your lab before finishing?" and "Why did they leave?"

Then verify by finding and contacting these former students if possible.

 

Warning Sign #7: They block outside collaborations

Bad advisors control who their students work with, limiting their growth and connections.

How to check: Ask: "Would you support me if I wanted to collaborate with professors at other universities?" and

"Have your current students worked with other research groups?"

 

Warning Sign #8: They have angry former students

Ex-students can tell you the truth about an advisor.

How to check: Find and contact former students (through LinkedIn or department websites). Ask: "Would you choose this advisor again?"

Listen carefully to their tone, not just their words.

 

 

Key Takeaways:

  1. Look at their track record, not their promises - Check actual graduation times and job placements of previous students.
  2. Watch how they treat current students - The way they act with current students is how they'll treat you.
  3. Trust the pattern, not the exception - If multiple students have had problems, you probably will too, no matter how "different" you think you are.
  4.  

→ Your Action Plan for This Week

This week, before you commit to any PhD advisor:

  • Visit the lab or research group to watch how people interact
  • Check graduation times and job placements for the last five years
  • Talk to at least three current and two former students without the advisor present

 

Well, that’s it for today.

See you next week.


Whenever you're ready, there are 3 ways I can help you:

 

1. Get free actionable tips on how to secure a tenure-track job in academia by following me on X, LinkedIn me Instagram and BlueSky

 

2. Take my Academic Job Seekers Assessment quiz to receive personalised recommendations & discover my 6P Academic Job Accelerator Program.

 

3. If you're ready to take your PhD application journey to the next level, join my PhD Application and Scholarship Masterclass waitlist. Click the link below to learn more and secure your spot.

 

Responses

Join the conversation
t("newsletters.loading")
Loading...
#171 - Why This Method and Not Another: The One-Sentence Answer
What examiners and reviewers want from your methods section, and why one short sentence sorts it. 21 October 2026 Read time: 2 minutes There's a sentence I find in most methodology chapters I'm sent, and it does no work at all. "A quantitative approach was also considered but was deemed unsuitable for this study." I'd guess you've got something like this. Most candidates have a version ...
#170 - How to Make Your Thesis and Papers Argue: The Verb Swap
The verb change that tells an examiner or reviewer what you think, and why it feels arrogant until you know what they're reading for. 14 October 2026 Read time: 2 minutes   Free live session: Pass or Revise, Wednesday 21 October Pass or Revise is next Wednesday, 21 October, with a European and a US slot on the same day. I will read three real anonymised pages from a thesis and tell...
#169 - The 2 Parts of a Literature Review AI Cannot Write for You: The Position Test
Today I'm showing you why AI gives you thirty summaries instead of a review, and the one-sentence test that tells you which one you've got. 7 October 2026 Read time: 2 minutes   Free live session: Pass or Revise, Wednesday 21 October I read three actual but anonymised pages on the spot and tell you what I'd be writing on the examiner's report. First, you score each one before I do....

The Research Insider

What an examiner actually saw this week. A short letter from the other side of the viva table. I was a lost PhD student once, in my office at 2am, surrounded by papers nobody had taught me how to read. I got through it. Then I sat on the examiner's side of the table more than forty-five times, and learned the thing nobody had told me. Whether you pass comfortably rarely comes down to how good your research is. It comes down to whether your thesis shows the examiner what they're looking for, and most capable people were never shown that. That's all this letter does. Three weeks out of four it's short, about four hundred words. One real thing I read, details changed: a sentence that doesn't say what it thinks it says, a method that won't survive the first question, a passage where the writer's own voice has quietly disappeared. What I saw when I read it cold, the fix, and a test you can run on your own work tonight. That last one is newer, and it's where most of the worry is now. The question I get asked is whether a detection tool will flag them. The question that decides anything is whether an examiner will believe the thinking is theirs, and those aren't the same question. I train universities on this, and I've sat on the faculty side when a tool flagged an honest candidate, so I know how that conversation goes and what evidence actually helps. The fourth week is longer. Once a month I read every page people send me for Pass or Revise, my live session where three of them get read out loud. Then I write up what I found across the whole pile, including what it made me change in the way I teach. Free, and one ask a month at most. 45+ doctoral theses examined across 15+ universities. 25+ PhDs supervised to completion. 35+ working professionals mentored through a doctorate alongside a career. 240,000 researchers follow my work on LinkedIn. Free, and one ask a month at most.
© 2026 PHDTOPROF. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Join The FREE Challenge

Enter your details below to join the challenge.